P1.081. The Effect of Pre-Rehabilitation During Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Esophageal Cancer

Clicks: 20
ID: 325939
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #141 of 453 articles by views in diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the international society for diseases of the esophagus

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 453 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Topic Esophageal Cancer: Adjuvant and Neo-Adjuvant Therapies Background The standard treatment for resectable advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by surgery. Rehabilitation is recommended during NAC; however several adverse events often hinder its completion. This study examined the impact of rehabilitation completion rates during NAC on postoperative complications. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 111 patients who had esophagectomy after NAC for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma between January 2017 and December 2024. Preoperative chemotherapy was selected as either DCF (Docetaxel + Cisplatin (CDDP) + 5-FU) therapy or CF (CDDP + 5-FU) therapy in accordance with the Esophageal cancer practice guideline 2022. Adverse events were evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0. All patients underwent radical esophagectomy via a right thoracic approach. Rehabilitation was defined as 20-minute sessions, prescribed as two units per day. Completion rate = (units performed ÷ units prescribed) × 100. Based on a 67.5% cutoff from ROC analysis, patients were divided into insufficient (Group I, n = 46) and sufficient (Group S, n = 65) groups. Clinical and pathological factors were compared. Results Patients in Group I experienced grade 3 or higher adverse events more frequently than in Group S (65.2% vs. 44.6%, p = 0.036). Group S had a superior relative dose intensity for both 5-FU and CDDP (median 5-FU 80.0 vs. 90.0, p = 0.006; CDDP 75.0 vs. 86.7, p = 0.014). Patients in Group S showed a lower weight than in Group I (median 54.7 kg vs. 58.0 kg, p = 0.032). Postoperative pneumonia (30.4% vs. 7.7%, p = 0.004) and atelectasis (28.3% vs. 7.7%, p = 0.008) were significantly more frequent in Group I than in Group S. Multivariate analysis identified rehabilitation completion as an independent factor reducing postoperative pneumonia (OR 0.177, p = 0.003, 95% CI 0.057–0.548). Conclusion Completion of the prehabilitation program during NAC may prevent postoperative pneumonia after esophagectomy. These findings may help determine the optimal supportive care during NAC.
Reference Key
openalex_W7203990266 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the international society for diseases of the esophagus
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/dote/doag077.229
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.