P1.198. Systematic Screening for Anastomotic Leakage After Esophagectomy for Cancer: Lessons Learned From a Retrospective Analysis

Clicks: 22
ID: 325917
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #132 of 453 articles by views in diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the international society for diseases of the esophagus

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 453 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Topic Esophageal Cancer: Surgical Treatment of Esophageal Cancer – early outcomes and complications Background Anastomotic leakage (AL) after esophagectomy for cancer is associated with negative outcomes that could be mitigated by screening and early treatment of the complication. We aimed to assess whether patients with AL diagnosed through systematic radiological screening did already exhibit signs of possible leakage which would have prompted diagnostic testing. Methods Patients undergoing esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis at a tertiary center between 2014 and 2021 were included. Systematic screening consisted of contrast swallow or computed tomography (CT) with per-oral contrast on postoperative days (POD) 4–5. Patients with positive screening were assessed for following signs suggestive of AL from POD 0 to POD 5: C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥ 300mg/L, new-onset leukocytosis with white blood cell count ≥ 10*109/L, temperature ≥ 38°C, tachycardia with ≥ 120 bpm, and presence of atrial dysrhythmia. Results Of 53 patients with intrathoracic AL, 49 (92.5%) underwent systematic screening and 9 (17.0%) were diagnosed at screening (contrast swallow 55.6%, CT 44.4%). In all these patients with positive screening, signs suggestive of AL were already present: elevated CRP in 2 (22%), new-onset leukocytosis in 3 (33.3%), fever in 6 (66.7%), tachycardia in 6 (66.7%), and atrial dysrhythmia in 1 (11.1%). Of note, the 40 (81.6%) patients with negative screening developed AL on median day 9.5 (interquartile range 7-15.25), despite initial screening being negative. Conclusion Although early diagnosis of AL is key to its successful management, systematic screening could only diagnose patients who were already exhibiting symptoms or signs suggestive of leakage. With day of AL-diagnosis varying strongly in our cohort, and screening providing a false sense of security in 81.6% of patients, these results advocate for a more patient-tailored, targeted approach to screening for AL.
Reference Key
openalex_W7203991699 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Ward Seurs, Isabela Camargo De Sousa, Willem de Coninck, Johnny Moons, Stijn Vanstraelen, Hans Van Veer, Philippe Nafteux, Lieven Depypere
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the international society for diseases of the esophagus
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/dote/doag077.346
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doag077.346
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.