P1.159. Long-Term and Perioperative Outcomes of Ivor-Lewis Single-Incision Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (SIMIE) for Esophageal Cancer: Comparison With McKeown MIE

Clicks: 17
ID: 325913
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #319 of 453 articles by views in diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the international society for diseases of the esophagus

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 453 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Topic Esophageal Cancer: Surgical Treatment of Esophageal Cancer Background Minimally invasive esophagectomy has been gradually adopted as an effective surgical option for the treatment of esophageal cancer. However, the optimal surgical approach, including port placement and anastomotic site, remains to be determined. Methods In the present study, we evaluated the perioperative and long-term survival outcomes of single-incision Ivor Lewis minimally invasive esophagectomy with intrathoracic esophagogastrostomy for treating esophageal cancer and compared them with those of tri-incision SIMIE with cervical esophagogastrostomy (McKeown approach). Results A total of 157 patients underwent Ivor Lewis SIMIE and 396 underwent McKeown SIMIE. Compared with the McKeown group, more patients in the Ivor Lewis group had tumors located in the lower third of the thoracic esophagus (60% vs. 15%) and adenocarcinoma in histology (23.7% vs. 2.3%) (P < 0.001 for both). There was no significant difference in overall or major surgical complications, including anastomotic leakage (7.0% vs. 6.3%, p > 0.05) and pneumonia (10.2% vs. 13.4%, p > 0.05), between the two groups. However, the incidence of vocal cord palsy was significantly lower in the Ivor Lewis group (2.5% vs. 8.1%, p = 0.017). The 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 48.5% and 42.5% in the Ivor Lewis group and 42.4% and 34.4% in the McKeown group, respectively (p = 0.28). No significant survival differences were also observed among patients after classifying with pathological staging. Conclusion Ivor Lewis SIMIE with intrathoracic esophagogastrostomy provides comparable perioperative and long-term overall survival outcomes to those performed by McKeown SIMIE with cervical esophagogastrostomy. However, Ivor Lewis SIMIE is associated with a significantly lower incidence of postoperative vocal cord palsy.
Reference Key
openalex_W7204007879 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Jang-Ming Mail, Pei‐Ming Huang, Shuenn‐Wen Kuo, Ke-Cheng Chen, Mong-Wei Lin
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the international society for diseases of the esophagus
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/dote/doag077.307
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doag077.307
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.