A generalized approach for estimating the pace of aging
Clicks: 3
ID: 325862
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
0.6
/100
3 views
2 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #46 of 129 articles by views in the journals of gerontology series a, biological sciences and medical sciences
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 129 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Quantifying the rate of aging is essential for understanding age-related physiological decline and predicting late-life outcomes. The Pace of Aging (PoA) framework addresses this by modeling longitudinal changes across multiple biomarkers. However, the original Dunedin PoA assigns equal weight to all biomarkers and was derived from a young cohort with limited mortality follow-up, which restricts its applicability in older populations and in settings where biomarker relevance is uncertain. METHODS: We developed a weighted Pace of Aging (wPoA) using data from the Swedish Adoption/Twin Study of Aging (SATSA), a longitudinal cohort of older adults with up to nine waves of biomarker data collected over three decades. Using mixed effects models, we estimated individual random intercepts and slopes for 10 biomarkers and assigned weights to these random effects based on their association with time-to-mortality. This mortality-informed weighting distinguishes the wPoA from the original Dunedin PoA. RESULTS: We found that wPoA was positively correlated with established biological age predictors and more strongly correlated with low-dimensional predictors such as Functional Aging Index (FAA) and the Frailty Index (FI). Modest correlations across all considered predictors suggest that each measure captures distinct aspects of biological aging. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the wPoA framework introduces a data-driven weighting of random effects and is particularly well-suited for aging cohorts and in settings where marker relevance is uncertain a priori, such as high-dimensional or omics-based contexts. This work provides a foundation for future single-timepoint surrogates that can also be used in settings lacking rich longitudinal data.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7203890809
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Marije H. Sluiskes, Joris Deelen, Hein Putter, Sara Hägg, Mar Rodriguez-Girondo |
| Journal | the journals of gerontology series a, biological sciences and medical sciences |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/gerona/glag205
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.