Phylogenomic subsampling and upsampling for efficient evolutionary analyses of big data
Clicks: 1
ID: 325815
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #241 of 242 articles by views in molecular biology and evolution
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 242 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Long runtimes, high memory demands, and reliance on high-performance computing impede phylogenomic analyses. We review a scalable phylogenomic subsampling with upsampling (PSU) framework, in which small subsamples of sites from a concatenated alignment are expanded by upsampling before inference, and the resulting analyses are then aggregated to obtain evolutionary estimates. PSU harnesses the fact that the computational cost of maximum likelihood analysis is strongly influenced by the number of distinct site patterns in the concatenated alignment, whereas statistical power depends primarily on the amount of evolutionary information represented by the total number of sites and substitutions. By reducing the former while restoring the latter through upsampling, PSU can approximate many full-alignment analyses at substantially lower computational cost. Analysis of simulated and empirical datasets shows that PSU can accurately estimate bootstrap support values, select the optimal substitution model, test evolutionary hypotheses, and infer branch lengths, divergence times, and associated uncertainty measures, while reducing runtime and memory requirements by orders of magnitude. PSU also provides distributions of inferred clade support across independent subsamples, enabling detection of conflicting phylogenetic signals that may remain hidden in conventional bootstrap analysis. Automated tuning of subsample size, the number of subsamples, and the number of upsampling replicates make PSU practical across diverse datasets. We suggest that PSU is a general strategy for scalable phylogenomic inference using a broad range of statistical methods. By enabling analyses of genome-scale alignments on commodity hardware, PSU broadens research access and reduces environmental and infrastructural costs of big-data phylogenomics.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7165626004
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Sudhir Kumar, Koichiro Tamura, Sudip Sharma |
| Journal | molecular biology and evolution |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/molbev/msag218
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.