P1.162. Does Deprivation Drive Outcomes? Socioeconomic Factors in Esophageal Cancer Resections
Clicks: 2
ID: 325749
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
0.3
/100
2 views
1 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #358 of 453 articles by views in diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the international society for diseases of the esophagus
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 453 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Topic Esophageal Cancer: Surgical Treatment of Esophageal Cancer Background Esophageal cancer incidence is higher in socioeconomically deprived populations. While deprivation is linked to established risk factors, its impact on tumour stage, comorbidity burden, and postoperative outcomes among patients undergoing esophagectomy remains unclear. This study assessed whether socioeconomic deprivation influences perioperative and oncological outcomes following Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Methods This retrospective study included all patients undergoing Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for cancer at a single high-volume centre between October 2019 and May 2025. Socioeconomic status was measured using the English Index of Multiple Deprivation. One patient residing in Scotland was excluded. Associations between deprivation and demographics, tumour characteristics, comorbidity burden, length of stay, postoperative complications, and mortality were analysed. Spearman correlation was used for continuous variables, ordinal regression for tumour stage, and binary logistic regression for categorical outcomes, including complications and mortality. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05. Results Of 341 patients, 340 were analysed. Deprivation showed no correlation with age (r=0.075, p=0.169), body mass index (r=−0.068, p=0.213), or Charlson comorbidity index (r=−0.02, p=0.732). No association was observed with tumour histology (adenocarcinoma OR 1.04, p=0.711), receipt of neoadjuvant therapy (OR 1.06, p=0.616), or clinical stage (OR 0.95, p=0.188). Length of stay was not correlated with deprivation (r=−0.037, p=0.496). Deprivation was not associated with major complications (Clavien–Dindo ≥III; OR 0.93, p=0.373), in-hospital mortality (OR 0.99, p=0.978), 30-day mortality (OR 1.79, p=0.091), or 90-day mortality (OR 1.10, p=0.65). Conclusion Socioeconomic deprivation was not associated with tumour stage, comorbidity burden, or postoperative outcomes following Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. These findings suggest equitable surgical care delivery once patients reach operative treatment. Inequalities in esophageal cancer outcomes are likely driven by factors occurring earlier in the disease pathway, emphasising the importance of prevention, early detection, and timely referral.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7203864068
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Jakub Chmelo, Natawadee Chantima, Isabel Miglior, Alexander Phillips |
| Journal | diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the international society for diseases of the esophagus |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/dote/doag077.310
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.