PD01.05. Preoperative Response to FLOT and Pathologic and Survival Outcomes in Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma

Clicks: 3
ID: 325714
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #5 of 453 articles by views in diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the international society for diseases of the esophagus

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 453 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Topic Esophageal Cancer: Adjuvant and Neo-Adjuvant Therapies Background Perioperative 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT) is standard of care in resectable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA). Pre-operative staging and re-staging computed tomography (CT) or positron emission tomography (PET) can determine tumour response to FLOT before surgery, affecting decision-making surrounding adjuvant chemotherapy. This study aimed to determine whether pre-operative response to FLOT was associated with pathologic and survival outcomes. Methods Patients with GEA who received neoadjuvant FLOT and subsequently underwent surgery from January 2017 to April 2025 at University Health Network (UHN), Canada, were retrospectively analysed. Staging and re-staging CT and PET were used to determine GEA response to FLOT, patients were then separated into FLOT responders (FR) or non-responders (FNR). Pathologic and overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results 169 patients were included for final analysis, of which 116 (68.6%) were FR and 53 (31.4%) were FNR. Median follow-up was 24 months. The FR group had better ECOG status, less advanced ypT and ypN stage, greater tumor response to neoadjuvant treatment, and lower rates of lymphovascular and perineural invasion. Median OS was higher in the FR group (67 vs. 43.8 months, log rank p=0.016). Median DFS was higher in the FR group (32 vs. 20 months, log rank p=0.018). Pre-operative FLOT response was not a predictor of OS (p=0.101) or DFS (p=0.196) on multivariable analysis. Conclusion Patients who demonstrated pre-operative radiologic or metabolic response to FLOT had more favourable pathologic measures and superior OS and DFS on univariate analysis. This survival advantage was not seen on multivariable analysis. Non-response to FLOT in the preoperative setting can inform decision-making regarding adjuvant systemic therapy, with a potential to pivot.
Reference Key
openalex_W7203938571 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Jin-soo Park, Frances Allison, Jonathan Allen, Raymond Jang, Lucy Ma, Carly Barron, Elena Elimova, Jelena Lukovic, Aruz Mesci, Rebecca Wong, Patrik Rogalla, Patrick Veit-Haibach, Fayez Quereshy, Karineh Kazazian, Carol Swallow, Jonathan Yeung, Elliot Wakeam
Journal diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the international society for diseases of the esophagus
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/dote/doag077.075
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.