P1.241. Comparative Outcomes of Triple-Layer Hand-Sewn Versus Double Linear Stapled Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis Following Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy

Clicks: 1
ID: 325664
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #79 of 453 articles by views in diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the international society for diseases of the esophagus

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 453 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Topic Esophageal Cancer: Surgical Treatment of Esophageal Cancer – technique Background Cervical anastomosis after esophagectomy carries leak rates approaching 30%. Although the choice between stapled and hand-sewn techniques is often based on surgeon preference, existing literature suggests similar leak rates. However, numerous technical modifications within each approach limit the comparability across institutions. We analyzed outcomes of the double linear stapled (modified Collard) method versus the triple-layer hand-sewn anastomosis. Methods Locally advanced esophageal cancer who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) with cervical esophagogastric anastomosis at a single center between January 2023 and December 2025 were retrospectively reviewed. For the linear stapled (LS) side to side anastomosis, two 60-mm staplers were utilized, whereas the hand-sewn (HS) anastomosis was performed using 4-0 vicryl RB sutures (first and third layers-interrupted, mucosal layer- continuous). Oral feeding was initiated on postoperative day (POD) 6 following LS anastomosis and on POD 1 following HS anastomosis. Postoperative outcomes were systematically analyzed. Results Seventy patients were analyzed (44 LS, 26 HS). Baseline characteristics, including TNM stage, neoadjuvant therapy, surgical approach, and extent of resection, were comparable between groups, with R0 resection achieved in all cases. Anastomosis time was significantly shorter in the LS group (7 vs. 18 minutes). AL occurred in 3 patients (6.8%) in the LS group and 1 patient (3.8%) in the HS group. Stricture rates were similar (4.5% vs. 3.8%). The HS group demonstrated shorter median hospital stay (6 vs. 10 days) and earlier advancement to solid food (8 vs. 15 days). Major pulmonary complications and 30-day mortality were comparable. Functional outcomes favored HS, with markedly lower neck fullness during eating (7.6% vs. 90%) and reflux symptoms (3.8% vs. 45.4%). Conclusion Triple-layer HS anastomosis demonstrated comparable safety and oncological outcomes to LS, with faster recovery and superior functional results. These findings suggest HS may offer advantages in postoperative quality of life, though prospective multicenter studies are needed for confirmation.
Reference Key
openalex_W7203888965 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Shiv Rajan
Journal diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the international society for diseases of the esophagus
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/dote/doag077.389
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doag077.389
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.