Annual vs semi-annual follow-up in low complexity virologically suppressed people with HIV: a randomized interventional trial
Clicks: 3
ID: 325553
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
0.6
/100
3 views
2 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #371 of 531 articles by views in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 531 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The increasing heterogeneity in people with HIV makes it necessary to evaluate new follow-up strategies tailored to clinical/social complexity. METHODS: Prospective, single-center, randomized, non-inferiority clinical-trial comparing two follow-up strategies - semi-annual standard care (SoC) or annual visits for 24 months- in virologically suppressed people with HIVand low-complexity profile, according to the GeSIDA "HIV Patient Stratification System". The primary endpoint was non-inferiority (prespecified lower margin: -4%) in virological control (viral load <50 copies/mL; FDA snapshot). Secondary outcomes included adherence, quality of life, satisfaction, and healthcare costs. RESULTS: Of 394 eligible candidates, 71 declined participation (48% preferring to maintain SoC) and 321 were randomized (162 SoC, 159 Annual). Participants were predominantly male (89%), MSM (78%), Spanish (63%), median age of 45 years and 13 years of HIV follow-up, without baseline differences between groups. Overall, 283 (88%) completed the study; 25 switched to long-acting therapy and 10 were lost or transferred. Virological control was similar in SoC and Annual arms: 86.42% vs 86.79% (ITT) and 98.29% vs 97.87% (PP), although non-inferiority was not statistically demonstrated. During the study, the increment from baseline in the proportion of highly satisfied participants was significant in the Annual arm (p=0.001). Reductions in HIV-related direct costs (-25.3%; p<0.001) were greater in the Annual group. CONCLUSIONS: Among people with HIV and low complexity, annual follow-up achieved virological outcomes clinically comparable to semi-annual care, despite not meeting the formal non-inferiority threshold. Annual follow-up was associated with significant increment in patient satisfaction and lower HIV direct-related costs.
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (71 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7203770689
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Iván Chivite, M J Merino-Peñas, Ana Gonzalez‐Cordón, Maria Martínez‐Rebollar, Berta Torres, Lorena de la Mora, Alexy Inciarte, Alberto Foncillas, Júlia Calvo, Juan Ambrosioni, Abiu Sempere, Leire Berrocal, José Luís Blanco, José M. Miró, Roger Llobet, Emma Fernández, Estebán Martínez, Josep Mallolas, Elisa de Lazzari, Montserrat Laguno |
| Journal | Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/cid/ciag491
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.