A modern phytolith reference collection for selected native Australian plants: Implications for vegetation reconstruction

Clicks: 1
ID: 325487
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
0.0 /100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Phytolith analysis is widely applied in palaeoecological and archaeological research, but its interpretive strength depends on the availability of robust modern reference collections. This study expands the modern Australian phytolith reference collection by analysing 42 native plant species representing 24 families and 37 genera with emphasis on silicification patterns across major growth forms, including forbs, shrubs, trees, and C3 grasses. METHODS: Phytoliths were extracted from available plant parts, including leaves, stems, flowers, seeds, seed pods, cones, and roots, depending on sample availability. Morphotypes were identified following ICPN 2.0, with grass silica short cell phytoliths (GSSCPs) further classified by shape and size to examine subfamily-level patterns. Phytolith morphotype percentage data were analysed using Hellinger transformation, PerMANOVA, PCA, LDA, and hierarchical clustering to assess compositional differences among plant growth forms and grass subfamilies. KEY RESULTS: Phytolith production varied strongly among growth forms and plant parts. Grasses were abundant producers, whereas most forbs, shrubs, and trees were trace producers or non-producers. Leaves were the most consistent source of phytoliths, while seeds and seed pods were predominantly non-producers. Grass silica short-cell phytolith (GSSCP) morphotypes showed clear subfamily-level differentiation. Pooideae produced Rondel morphotypes. Danthonoideae produced Rondel as well as wide Bilobate types. Panicoideae and Oryzoideae exhibited a pronounced Bilobate signature, commonly associated with Polylobate and Cross forms. Non-grass taxa (woody, shrubs, and forbs) were dominated by Spheroids, Tracheary elements, Epidermal, and Polygonal sheets and other non-diagnostic forms. Phytolith assemblages differed significantly among plant families, with Poaceae uniquely producing GSSCPs, while non-grass families showed greater overlap in assemblage composition. CONCLUSION: By expanding taxonomic and anatomical coverage, this study strengthens the capabilities of phytoliths in the reconstruction of grasslands and in general paleo vegetation in Australia, especially where other proxies such as pollen are limited.
Reference Key
openalex_W7203751578 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Manoshi Hazra, Alison Crowther, Francesca McInerney, Caroline A E Strömberg, Melodina Fabillo
Journal Annals of botany
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/aob/mcag265
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.