Alternative diagnostic labels for melanoma in-situ: a randomised online experiment

Clicks: 24
ID: 325313
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #101 of 412 articles by views in the british journal of dermatology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 412 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Half of the participants in this randomized online experiment of 1655 Australian adults would prefer to not have a wide local excision after a completely excised low-risk melanocytic lesion, if offered this option. Using the term “low risk melanocytic neoplasm” instead of “melanoma in-situ” reduced anxiety and the proportion choosing a wide local excision. Across all label groups, most participants preferred to attend routine 6-monthly clinic visits for follow-up, likely reflecting the high prevalence of this in the Australian context.
Reference Key
openalex_W7203631196 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal the british journal of dermatology
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/bjd/ljag341
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.