Development and application of a framework for classifying stakeholder roles in co-creation research: a Health CASCADE study

Clicks: 11
ID: 325207
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #28 of 93 articles by views in turkish journal of public health

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Aim Given the diversity of stakeholder engagement in co-creation research and the absence of an operational classification of stakeholder roles, this study aimed to develop a classification framework for co-creator roles and demonstrate its practical application in classifying stakeholder engagement. Subject and methods To develop the co-creation roles framework, we searched Google Images and Google Scholar to identify concepts and frameworks relevant to co-creation roles. To demonstrate its application, we applied the framework to classify stakeholder roles in studies on youth co-creation in public health interventions. Studies were identified through a systematic review using four databases (OVID/Medline, Ebsco/APA PsycINFO, Ebsco/CINAHL, Elsevier/Scopus), following PRISMA guidelines and registering the protocol on PROSPERO (CRD42024628813). Results The Google Images and Google Scholar search yielded five articles addressing co-creation role elements such as ‘stages of co-creation’ and ‘stakeholder levels of engagement’. The systematic review included 39 articles describing n = 19 youth-focused public health projects underpinned by co-creation ( n = 9), youth participatory action research ( n = 7) or community-based participatory research ( n = 3), revealing stakeholder engagement at multiple levels. Conclusion This study presents an operational classification framework for describing co-creation roles among diverse stakeholders, providing a practical approach to improving transparency and comparability across co-creation research.
Reference Key
openalex_W7203676018 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Katrina Messiha, Mai J. M. Chinapaw, Johannes C. F. Ket, Renée I. Wink, Teatske M. Altenburg
Journal turkish journal of public health
Year 2026
DOI
10.1007/s10389-026-02881-2
URL
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-026-02881-2
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.