Different strategies, shared trajectories: Biomass-allocation scaling during establishment and recovery from disturbance in perennial herbs

Clicks: 32
ID: 325099
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #67 of 275 articles by views in Annals of botany

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 275 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Clonal and non-clonal perennial herbs differ in adult architecture, particularly in the presence of belowground clonal organs. These contrasting strategies may already shape biomass allocation in young plants, potentially constraining growth and recovery from disturbance. We tested whether clonal and non-clonal perennial herbs differ in biomass allocation scaling during establishment and whether disturbance produces persistent changes in these scaling relationships after recovery. METHODS: We conducted a greenhouse experiment with 31 temperate meadow perennial herbs exposed to five disturbance treatments (two levels of aboveground biomass removal, belowground injury, flooding, and spring frost). Disturbed plants were harvested after approximately three months of recovery. We quantified biomass in major compartments and analysed scaling relationships among them. KEY RESULTS: Belowground-aboveground scaling was isometric at the age of two months, shifting weakly toward allometry at the age of five months, with no differences between strategies. After recovery, disturbance did not alter belowground-aboveground, leaf-stem, or generative-aboveground scaling. By contrast, a potential strategy signal emerged in turnover. Dead-aboveground biomass scaling was allometric, differed between clonal and non-clonal herbs, and disturbance reduced this allometry in non-clonals, while leaving it stable in clonals. CONCLUSIONS: During the first year of life, strategy differences were not evident in biomass allocation scaling among major living compartments, but a potential strategy signal emerged in aboveground turnover. These results suggest that establishment and season-end recovery in perennial herbs proceed within conserved scaling constraints, whereas strategy divergence may first be expressed through tissue turnover and become more apparent later as persistent clonal organs begin to form.
Reference Key
openalex_W7203655687 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Annals of botany
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/aob/mcag260
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.