Informative Certification: Screening vs. Acquisition

Clicks: 4
ID: 324800
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #33 of 193 articles by views in The Review of Economic Studies

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 193 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract We study monopolistic certification in markets where sellers possess partial private information about product quality. A certifier can provide information through two channels: screening sellers’ private information (soft information) and acquiring new quality data (hard information). We prove that any certification menu achieving less than maximal screening is Pareto dominated by one with full screening. Among Pareto-efficient menus, the certifier’s profit-maximising menu provides maximal soft information while restricting hard information provision. The two channels diverge because screening creates value the certifier can fully capture, whereas hard information amplifies costly information rents. Using power value functions, we derive comparative statics showing that information restrictions target low-quality sellers when information value is moderate, but high-quality sellers receive perfect quality revelation when information value is high.
Reference Key
openalex_W7113151568 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Gorkem Celik, Roland Strausz
Journal The Review of Economic Studies
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/restud/rdag083
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.