Ten tips for the diagnosis and management of nephrotic syndrome

Clicks: 2
ID: 324749
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #68 of 127 articles by views in clinical kidney journal

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 127 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Nephrotic syndrome (NS) encompasses a heterogeneous group of glomerular diseases characterized by heavy proteinuria, hypoalbuminemia, edema, and multiple systemic complications. Despite substantial advances in diagnostic techniques and targeted therapies, the management of NS remains challenging in clinical practice. In addition to complex treatment decisions, clinicians must address diagnostic uncertainty, recognize secondary causes, and prevent potentially serious complications including thrombosis, infections, cardiovascular disease, and progressive kidney dysfunction. Adverse outcomes in NS frequently arise not only from inappropriate management but also from overlooked steps in diagnosis, monitoring, and long-term care. Here, we present 10 practical tips to improve clinical decision-making in the diagnosis and management of NS. Key positive strategies include appropriate use of kidney biopsy and modern immunopathologic techniques, integration of immunologic biomarkers such as anti-phospholipase A2 receptor antibodies in the evaluation of membranous nephropathy, systematic exclusion of secondary causes, and comprehensive supportive care including blood pressure control, antiproteinuric therapy, and thrombosis prophylaxis in high-risk patients. In addition, evidence-based use of immunosuppressive therapies (IST) tailored to specific disease entities is emphasized. Equally important are commonly overlooked pitfalls that may compromise outcomes, including delayed genetic testing in steroid-resistant disease, prolonged ineffective immunosuppression, inadequate post-transplant surveillance for recurrence, under-recognition of cardiovascular risk, and failure to prevent complications associated with IST. Highlighting these practical considerations may help increase awareness of common pitfalls and support more attentive clinical management of patients with NS.
Reference Key
openalex_W7202305472 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors İlay Berke, Annette Bruchfeld, Eleni Frangou, Sarah Moran, Luís F. Quintana, Kate Stevens, Y K Onno Teng, Stefanie Steiger, Andreas Kronbichler, Şafak Mirioğlu
Journal clinical kidney journal
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/ckj/sfag268
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.