Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibition in Dialysis-Dependent Patients with Chronic Heart Failure due to Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Hemmung des Renin-Angiotensin-Systems bei dialysepflichtigen Patienten mit chronischer Herzinsuffizienz infolge einer reduzierten Ejektionsfraktion: Eine systematische Übersichtsarbeit und Metaanalyse

Clicks: 35
ID: 324731
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #17 of 153 articles by views in nephrology dialysis transplantation

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 153 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Background and hypothesis Evidence supporting renin–angiotensin system (RAS) inhibition in dialysis-dependent patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) remains limited. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEi/ARBs) in this population (PROSPERO ID: CRD420251274393). Methods Outcomes of interest included all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality. Eligible studies included adult patients with chronic HFrEF on maintenance hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis, comparing ARNI versus non-ARNI regimens and ACEi/ARB versus control regimens. Literature searches were conducted through December 2025 in PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and Web of Science. Hazard ratios (HRs) and their respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled and meta-analyzed across studies. Results Overall, six studies evaluated ARNIs (3,818 treated; 4,344 controls), and three studies evaluated ACEi/ARBs (3,293 treated; 1,982 controls). ARNI use versus non-ARNI regimens was associated with significantly lower all-cause mortality (pooled HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.71–0.87), as was ACEi/ARB initiation versus placebo or no RAS blockade (pooled HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.68–0.84). ACEi/ARB therapy was also associated with lower cardiovascular mortality (pooled HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.54–0.71), whereas no significant association was observed with ARNIs (pooled HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.79–1.04). Safety data were available only for ARNI studies, suggesting no excess hypotension and a lower risk of hyperkalemia compared with ACEi/ARBs. Conclusions In dialysis-dependent patients with HFrEF, ARNI use versus non-ARNI regimens, and ACEi/ARB use versus placebo or no RAS blockade, were each associated with lower all-cause mortality, while lower cardiovascular mortality was observed only with ACEi/ARB therapy. These findings suggest a potential overall benefit of RAS blockade in this population; however, they are derived predominantly from observational studies, remain susceptible to residual confounding and should not be interpreted as demonstrating causal treatment effects.
Reference Key
openalex_W7202257906 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal nephrology dialysis transplantation
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/ndt/gfag184
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.