How You Pay Drives What You Choose: Mental Accounting in Health Insurance Plan Choice

Clicks: 4
ID: 324598
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #36 of 195 articles by views in The Review of Economic Studies

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 195 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract We document that the source of funds for paying health insurance premiums has a dramatic impact on plan choices. We focus on the MediSave program in Singapore, a medical savings account that is used to pay out-of-pocket medical spending. Residents can also pay their health insurance premiums with cash or MediSave funds, but are subject to limits that vary by age and over time. By exploiting variations in those limits, we consistently find that when individuals are able to pay their health insurance premiums with MediSave funds, they are less price sensitive and more willing to enroll in more generous plans. We develop and estimate a mental accounting model which explains these patterns. We embed and reject alternative explanations such as hassle costs and liquidity constraints. We then extend this model and show that mental accounting can explain much, but not all, of the misweighting of premiums relative to out-of-pocket expenses in health insurance choice. We also find that allowing MediSave payment for both premiums and out-of-pocket expenses (e.g. putting them in the same mental account) enhances individual welfare and reduces adverse selection.
Reference Key
openalex_W7202146699 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Jonathan Gruber, Mengyun Lin, Haoming Liu, Junjian Yi
Journal The Review of Economic Studies
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/restud/rdag086
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdag086
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.