A novel RNA nucleic acid amplification test more accurately distinguishes active Clostridioides difficile infection from colonization
Clicks: 2
ID: 324583
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
0 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) is a leading cause of hospital-acquired infections with severity ranging from mild diarrhea to fulminant colitis and death. Current antigen tests lack adequate sensitivity and DNA-based nucleic acid amplification tests (DNA-NAATs) exhibit limited specificity for active infection, leading to either underdiagnosis or inappropriate treatment of colonized individuals. Unlike DNA, mRNA is expressed only by metabolically active bacteria and is rapidly hydrolyzed, providing natural advantages to distinguish active infection from colonization. METHODS: In this study, we developed and evaluated a novel multiplexed reverse-transcriptase PCR assay (RNA-NAAT) targeting C. diff-specific sequences. Sequential clinical samples (n=260) were collected in RNA-preservative solution from patients receiving standard of care C. diff diagnostic testing. All samples were evaluated with RNA-NAAT, Alere GDH/toxin EIA, Solana DNA-NAAT, and both forward- and reverse-2-Step Algorithms (2-SA). Samples yielding valid results on all platforms (n=239) with discordant test results (n=14) adjudicated via blinded chart review by infectious disease physicians. RESULTS: No cross-reactivity was observed with other gastrointestinal pathogens, commensal enteric flora, or closely-related Clostridioides species. Toxin gene RNA expression was detected in samples spiked with metabolically active C. diff at a limit of detection 30-to-50-fold less than current diagnostic methods. CONCLUSIONS: RNA-NAAT outperformed all comparator test strategies, simultaneously exhibiting higher sensitivity and specificity, including a higher specificity for active infection than the specific toxin EIA (99.5% vs 98.2%) and a higher sensitivity for organism identification than the sensitive DNA-NAAT (100% vs 88.2%), with significantly reduced false positive test results (1 vs 7).
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7202148905
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Kenneth D. Long, Daniel J. Silberger, John Hernandez, Thomas Detchemendy, Derek B. Moates, Tarek Abdalla, Lindsey E Hastings, Aditi Jani, Janet Kim, Myles Prados, Melissa B. Miller, J Martin Rodriguez, Sixto M. Leal |
| Journal | Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/cid/ciag482
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.