Cytogenetic constraints on hybridization: A meta-analysis investigating the role of chromosome number in monocot hybrid evolution using a newly developed tool, the ploidy deviation index (PDI)

Clicks: 2
ID: 324480
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #88 of 189 articles by views in Annals of botany

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 189 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hybridization is a major driver of plant diversity, yet the role of cytogenetic compatibility, particularly differences in chromosome number, remains poorly understood. Differences in parental chromosome number can present barriers to hybrid formation by disrupting meiotic stability, but the extent to which biological and ecological factors influence the chromosomal architecture of hybrids remains poorly quantified, especially in monocots. This study aims to investigate how chromosome number divergence interacts with biological and ecological factors to shape hybrid formation in monocots, using a novel quantitative metric, the Ploidy Deviation Index (PDI), to standardize comparisons of hybrid cytogenetic architecture. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We developed and applied the PDI, a continuous index quantifying chromosome-number deviation between a hybrid and its two parents, across approximately 200 hybrid cases with documented parental karyotypes. Hybrids were categorized as homoploid, uniparentally homoploid, intermediate, or polyploid based on their PDI values. We analyzed the distribution of PDI scores in relation to type of hybrid origin (natural vs. artificial), growth habit, size of the genus (a proxy for richness), and range of chromosome number within a genus (proxy for diversity). Comparisons across categories employed Anderson-Darling k-sample tests, multinomial logistic regression, and Mann-Whitney U tests to determine significance. KEY RESULTS: Homoploid hybrids were found to be the most frequent. We found no significant difference in PDI distributions between natural and artificial hybrids. Significant variation in PDI distributions was found among growth habits, with aquatic hybrids more likely to be homoploid and geophytic hybrids showing higher proportions of polyploidy. Intermediate hybrids were common in larger genera with broader chromosome-number ranges, whereas polyploid hybrids showed the highest PDI values in large and karyotypically diverse genera. CONCLUSION: These results challenge long-held assumptions that polyploidy dominates hybrid formation and reveal that homoploid and intermediate chromosomal configurations are common in monocots. The PDI framework offers a powerful, standardized approach for assessing cytogenetic constraints on hybridization, with implications for systematics, evolutionary biology, and conservation.
Reference Key
openalex_W4416295111 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Justin Scholten, Adrian Sprenger, Ava Perez, Olivia Hullihen, Chelsea D. Specht
Journal Annals of botany
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/aob/mcag247
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcag247
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.