When Multimodal Fusion Fails: Contrastive Alignment as a Necessary Stabilizer for TCR–Peptide Binding Prediction
Clicks: 2
ID: 324168
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
0.3
/100
2 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #343 of 818 articles by views in BMC Bioinformatics
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 818 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
MOTIVATION: Multimodal learning is often assumed to improve predictive performance by combining complementary views, yet in biological applications auxiliary modalities are frequently imperfect, incomplete, or derived from upstream predictors and heuristics. We study this issue in TCR-peptide binding prediction, where sequence embeddings from pretrained protein language models are strong and transferable, but structure-derived residue graphs must be built from predicted folds and discretized contacts. These structural views can therefore be noisy, inconsistent across proteins, and sensitive to modeling choices, making them difficult to optimize jointly with sequence features. In this setting, naive sequence+graph fusion can destabilize training and degrade generalization, falling below a sequence-only baseline when supervision is scarce or contacts are noisy. This motivates a practical goal: use imperfect structural information when it helps, without sacrificing stability when it does not. RESULTS: We introduce TRACE, a lightweight framework that encodes each entity (TCR and peptide) with parallel sequence (frozen ESM-2) and residue-graph (GNN) towers, then applies CLIP-style intra-entity contrastive alignment before interaction modeling. The alignment encourages modality-consistent representations for the same biological entity, preventing noisy graph signals from dominating fusion. We evaluate under a leakage-controlled TCHard RN protocol with pair-disjoint splits, training-only model selection, and exclusion of negative-sampling metadata that otherwise trivially inflates AUROC. In this setting the task is near chance for all methods, and we do not claim state-of-the-art accuracy; our contribution is the failure-mode analysis, the alignment stabilizer, and the audited protocol itself. Among matched baselines TRACE attains the best mean AUROC (0.578±0.033 over five folds), and an ablation shows that intra-entity alignment acts as a stabilizer: it gives a small but consistent full-data gain (better on 4 of 5 folds), stays robust under substantial graph-edge corruption, and prevents collapse toward chance under limited supervision (+0.05 AUROC at 10-20% of labels), the regime where unconstrained fusion fails. How modalities are integrated, and how carefully they are evaluated, matters more than how many are used. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Code is available at https://github.com/MineSelf2016/TRACE and archived at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20635593. Data are available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.31991007.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7196930084
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Cong Qi, Wenbo Wang, Hanzhang Fang, Zhi Wei |
| Journal | BMC Bioinformatics |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/bioinformatics/btag573
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.