Objective 18: Invest in Skills Development and Facilitate Mutual Recognition of Skills, Qualifications and Competences
Clicks: 1
ID: 324159
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #1,500 of 1,517 articles by views in Oxford University Press eBooks
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,517 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract This chapter examines Objective 18 of the GCM, on skills development and mutual recognition of skills. Despite its potential, the Objective prioritizes short-term labour market integration and intergovernmental cooperation over the lifelong learning and upskilling rights of individual migrants. The chapter delves into the fragmented landscape of existing international frameworks on skills recognition, noting Objective 18’s limited success in harmonizing these standards. It then critiques the actor-oriented framework, which includes states and employers but excludes migrant associations and unions, reinforcing a business-centric approach. Moreover, the formulation of the Objective’s actions risks perpetuating epistemic inequalities, as mutual recognition frequently entails Global South countries adopting Global North countries’ certification methodologies, reflecting postcolonial power dynamics. While aiming to enhance labour mobility, Objective 18 fails to adequately balance the homogenization of skills assessment with the protection of educational pluralism, ultimately undermining its potential to foster equitable and sustainable career development for migrants across formal and informal economies.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7201851216
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Marion Panizzon |
| Journal | Oxford University Press eBooks |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/law/9780198863380.003.0019
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.