EP 669 Postoperative Antibiotic Stewardship in General Surgery: Compliance with NICE NG125 Guidelines

Clicks: 1
ID: 324063
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #413 of 432 articles by views in the british journal of surgery

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 432 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Background NICE guideline NG125 recommends that postoperative antibiotics are used only when infection is present, prophylactic antibiotics are discontinued within 24 hours, treatment is reviewed early, IV antibiotics are switched to oral promptly, & microbiology advice is sought for prolonged courses. This audit assessed compliance with NICE NG125 in our practice at DGH. Methods A retrospective audit of 60 adult general surgical patients over a two-month period was conducted. Data was collected & assessed against NG125-aligned standards, including documentation of indication, duration of therapy, timing of review, IV-to-oral switch, & microbiology involvement for antibiotic courses exceeding five days. Elective/ emergency surgery were compared, & multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of inappropriate antibiotic use. Results Postoperative antibiotics were prescribed in 66.7% of patients (70% elective, 30% emergency). Compliance with NICE NG125 standards was poor. A clear indication for antibiotics was documented in 80% of cases. Only 30% of prophylactic antibiotics were discontinued within 24 hours. IV antibiotics were reviewed within 48 hours in 65% of patients, and IV-to-oral switch within 72 hours occurred in 75% of eligible cases. Microbiology input for antibiotic courses longer than five days was documented in only 8.3%. Therapeutic antibiotic use for sepsis or peritonitis was more appropriate in emergency surgery than elective surgery (55.6% vs 19.0%; p = 0.004). Prolonged prophylactic antibiotic use was more common following elective surgery (47.6% vs 22.2%; p = 0.048). Conclusion Compliance with NICE NG125 was poor, especially in elective surgery, with unnecessary prolonged prophylaxis and delayed review requiring targeted stewardship.
Reference Key
openalex_W7172526110 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Altaf Haji, Vanojan Juwanwarnag, Ali Butt, Ali Mohamed, Aleksandra Laguna, Bala Piramanayagam
Journal the british journal of surgery
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/bjs/znag087.640
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.