SP 1.10 Simulated Open Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Low-Cost Pilot Study Enhancing the Future of Surgical Training

Clicks: 2
ID: 324030
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #419 of 432 articles by views in the british journal of surgery

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 432 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Aims Achieving competency for open inguinal hernias can be challenging due to varied exposure to training lists and learning curves. The aim of this course was to evaluate simulation in enhancing surgical proficiency and confidence in conducting open inguinal hernia repairs amongst core surgical trainees and resident doctors. Methods Videos demonstrating operative steps on a patient and model were shown to 8 candidates. Hand-sewn models were constructed from neoprene, costing £30 each. Feedback was attained from questionnaires. Pre and post-course confidence levels were measured using a 5-point Likert scale across operative steps and compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. p < 0.05 was statistically significant. Results Pre-course, 25% had no prior experience, 12.5% observed, 25% assisted and 37.5% performed steps supervised. Statistically significant improvements in self-reported confidence were observed in seven of the eight operative steps. Identifying surface anatomy (p = 0.206), skin incision and exposure of the inguinal canal (p = 0.023), identification of direct versus indirect inguinal hernia (p = 0.008), dissection and handling of hernia sac (p = 0.008), protection of cord structures (p = 0.017), mesh placement (p = 0.016) and fixation (p = 0.027) and wound closure (p = 0.023). All candidates found the model beneficial and would find a video-aided model course valuable. Conclusion This course allowed a safe environment to enhance confidence and approach to open inguinal hernias without patient safety risks. It has laid strong foundations to be incorporated into surgical training programmes, thereby enhancing access and facilitate tailored feedback to aid operative progression.
Reference Key
openalex_W7172492088 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Bhagat Manku, S Sravanam, David Luke
Journal the british journal of surgery
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/bjs/znag087.014
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.