TPW 3.11 Specialty Recruitment Since COVID-19 in the United Kingdom, United States and Australia: Scale, Selectivity, Distribution and Equity
Clicks: 1
ID: 324016
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #383 of 432 articles by views in the british journal of surgery
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 432 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Background Since 2020, specialty recruitment has shifted across the United-Kingdom, United-States, and Australia. Applications and funded posts moved at different speeds, and maldistribution means recruitment wins have not consistently translated into better patient access. Objective To compare post-COVID specialty recruitment across the three countries emphasizing scale and competitiveness, composition of recruits, geographic distribution, trainee wellbeing, and policy levers linking recruitment to equity. Design and data sources Review drawing on primary sources from 2023 to 2025, including national recruitment statistics, workforce reports, and trainee surveys. Results In the United Kingdom, 59,698 applications competed for 12,743 specialty posts in 2024—4.68 applicants per post. Medical vacancies reached 6.2 percent at June 2025. Internationally trained doctors comprised the majority of new residency joiners in 2023. The United States 2025 match offered 40,041 PGY-1 positions; international medical graduates filled roughly one quarter, while thousands of additional primary-care physicians would be needed to eliminate shortage designations. Australia recorded its largest GP intake in 2025 with over 1,750 entrants, 1/3rd training as Rural Generalists. Specialist full-time-equivalent per 100,000 remains roughly 160 in major cities versus 53 in remote areas. Internationally trained doctors constitute a majority of first-time registrants; 0.6 percent of practitioners identify as Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. Conclusions Post-COVID growth has not guaranteed equitable coverage. Binding constraints are distribution and retention in high-need communities. Equity-oriented reforms should link funded training to need metrics, reduce barriers for internationally trained doctors in shortage areas, require well-being safeguards, and track multi-year retention as a primary performance measure.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7172484165
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Muneeba Saeed, Devanshu Aggarwal, Sanjay Mehra, Hemant Sharma |
| Journal | the british journal of surgery |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/bjs/znag087.325
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.