SP 1.01 Evaluation of Early Postoperative Outcomes Following Laparoscopic versus Open Ventral Hernia Repair

Clicks: 1
ID: 324012
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #365 of 432 articles by views in the british journal of surgery

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 432 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Aim To compare the early postoperative outcomes between laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repair in a tertiary-care setting. Methods This prospective comparative study was conducted at the Shaheed Suhrawardy Medical College Hospital and Enam Medical College and Hospital, Dhaka, from January 2024 to July 2025. Seventy-eight patients with ventral hernias were randomized into two equal groups: laparoscopic (n = 39) and open (n = 39). Data on the perioperative outcomes, hospital stay, return to activity and early post-operative complications were collected and analyzed using SPSS 25.0. Results The mean operative time was longer for laparoscopic repair (110.5 ± 28.6 min vs. 85.2 ± 22.1 min, p < 0.001). However, laparoscopic repair resulted in significantly less blood loss (40 ± 25 mL vs. 120 ± 90 mL), lower pain scores, fewer analgesic doses, shorter hospital stay (2.8 ± 1.4 days vs. 5.6 ± 2.9 days) and earlier return to activity (10 days vs. 22 days). However, the mesh-related complications were collectively higher after laparoscopic repair (25.6% vs. 5.1%). Conclusion Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair provides superior short-term recovery benefits but carries an increased risk of wound and mesh-related complications. The choice of technique should therefore be individualized, balancing recovery advantages against the higher risk of mesh-specific morbidity.
Reference Key
openalex_W7172546046 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Syeda Mehbuba Joty, Ferdous Alam, Noshin Saiyara, Faridul Islam, Mahbuba Akter
Journal the british journal of surgery
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/bjs/znag087.008
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.