EP 601 TUBE-SBO: Timely Use and Benchmarking of Enteral decompression in Small Bowel Obstruction
Clicks: 1
ID: 323959
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #322 of 432 articles by views in the british journal of surgery
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 432 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Aims Upper gastrointestinal tract decompression by nasogastric tube (NGT) is standard practice when managing small bowel obstruction (SBO) to prevent aspiration and its complications, but a recent Prevention of Future Deaths report has raised concerns about delays in NGT placement. A retrospective audit of NGT placement was performed in a metropolitan University teaching hospital to assess adherence to national guidance and safety standards. Methods Twenty-one emergency presentations with small bowel obstruction were randomly identified between January and April 2025. Data were extracted from hospital electronic patient record systems. NGT insertion, time from diagnosis to insertion, documentation quality, and documentation of patient refusal were used to evaluate NGT placement practice. Results Thirteen male and twelve female patients were included in this study. An NGT was inserted in 15 (71%) patients. The median time from diagnosis to NGT insertion was 8.4 hours (IQR: 5.7–10.4). No records of NGT insertion were found in four (19%) case notes, of whom two (9.5%) underwent emergency laparotomy. Of the 15 NGTs placed, only 8 (53%) were documented. In both patients who declined NGT placement the risks of this were not documented. Conclusions This audit identified heterogeneity in management and inconsistency in documentation for SBO with NGTs, potentially exposing patients and clinicians to avoidable risks. The findings were presented at a departmental audit meeting, prompting urgent intervention: a hospital-wide Standard Operating Procedure was published, assigning responsibility for NGT insertion within two-hours to the diagnosing clinician. This was supported by a multidisciplinary education program.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7172531891
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | R Nieuwoudt, Robert Young, Raimundas Lunevičius, Nikhil Misra |
| Journal | the british journal of surgery |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/bjs/znag087.631
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.