SP 3.05 Utilisation of a Community Diagnostic Centre to Improve Colorectal Urgent Suspected Cancer Pathway Performance

Clicks: 1
ID: 323942
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #272 of 432 articles by views in the british journal of surgery

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 432 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Background Hospitals struggle to cope with the large number of patients referred on the urgent suspected cancer (USC) pathways. Diagnostic/treatment targets outlined in the NHS Long-Term Plan are often not met, resulting in long patient waiting times, increased staff workload, and high costs. Method We analysed a reinvented colorectal USC pathway, utilising nurse-led, consultant-supervised clinics delivered in a community diagnostic centre (CDC). All patients received a standardised face-to-face assessment by a nurse specialist to determine the diagnostic investigation and further management. We compared the delivery of the CDC clinics with the traditional pathway in terms of time from USC referral to first outpatient appointment (OPA), time until investigation, proportion of patients meeting the Faster Diagnosis Standard (FDS), cost of pathway delivery, and time to first OPA for routine referrals. Results The time to first OPA for USC referrals reduced from 14 to 3 days. The time to colonoscopy reduced from 16 to 11 days whilst the time to CT reduced from 17 to 6 days. FDS performance increased from 51% to 75%. The CDC pathway was cheaper, £373,222 per annum compared to £414,420. Additionally, time to first OPA for routine referrals reduced from 65 to 6 weeks following greater consultant availability. Conclusion We demonstrated that nurse-led clinics in a CDC can safely deliver the colorectal USC pathway with several benefits for both patients and hospital trusts. Standardising and streamlining the USC pathway in a CDC setting delivered benefits to both the USC and routine referral pathways.
Reference Key
openalex_W7172480610 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Jack Carter, Yan Li Goh, Jon Lacy‐Colson
Journal the british journal of surgery
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/bjs/znag087.037
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znag087.037
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.