TPW 4.07 Laparoscopic Appendicectomy as a Training Procedure: An Analysis of Outcomes by Surgeon Grade

Clicks: 1
ID: 323888
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
0.0 /100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Aims Laparoscopic appendicectomy (LA) is a core emergency general surgical procedure and a key training operation for developing laparoscopic skills. Its high case volume and typically low patient comorbidity make it a valuable target for evaluating surgical training outcomes. This study analyses whether surgeon training grade influences postoperative outcomes following LA. Methods A single-centre retrospective analysis was conducted of 229 LAs performed by consultants (n=32), registrars (n=109), and senior house officers (SHOs) (n=88) between June-December 2025. Outcomes were compared between training grades to determine whether surgical experience affected enhanced recovery after surgery. Primary outcomes included 30-day re-presentation rates, re-admission rates, and postoperative complication severity classified using the Clavien–Dindo (CD) system. Results Re-presentation rates were highest in consultant-performed cases (15.6%), followed by registrars (13.0%) and SHOs (9.1%). Overall re-admission rates were low, with the highest rate observed in registrar cases (7.4%), compared with consultants (3.1%) and SHOs (1.1%). Postoperative outcomes were excellent across all groups, with CD grade 0 being the most common outcome. CD grade 0 occurred most frequently in SHO-performed procedures (92.0%), followed by registrar (80.7%) and consultant (75.0%) cases. Higher-grade complications (up to CD IIIb) were observed only in registrar and consultant groups. Conclusions LA is a safe and effective training procedure for junior surgeons, with excellent postoperative outcomes observed in SHO-performed cases. Higher complication rates in senior-performed cases likely reflect appropriate allocation of more complex appendicitis to experienced surgeons. The findings from this centre support continued trainee involvement in LA with appropriate case selection and supervision.
Reference Key
openalex_W7172500012 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Kashifa Syed, A Hauperich, Tabitha Gould, Phill Pearce
Journal the british journal of surgery
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/bjs/znag087.334
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.