TPW 4.07 Laparoscopic Appendicectomy as a Training Procedure: An Analysis of Outcomes by Surgeon Grade
Clicks: 1
ID: 323888
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
0 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Aims Laparoscopic appendicectomy (LA) is a core emergency general surgical procedure and a key training operation for developing laparoscopic skills. Its high case volume and typically low patient comorbidity make it a valuable target for evaluating surgical training outcomes. This study analyses whether surgeon training grade influences postoperative outcomes following LA. Methods A single-centre retrospective analysis was conducted of 229 LAs performed by consultants (n=32), registrars (n=109), and senior house officers (SHOs) (n=88) between June-December 2025. Outcomes were compared between training grades to determine whether surgical experience affected enhanced recovery after surgery. Primary outcomes included 30-day re-presentation rates, re-admission rates, and postoperative complication severity classified using the Clavien–Dindo (CD) system. Results Re-presentation rates were highest in consultant-performed cases (15.6%), followed by registrars (13.0%) and SHOs (9.1%). Overall re-admission rates were low, with the highest rate observed in registrar cases (7.4%), compared with consultants (3.1%) and SHOs (1.1%). Postoperative outcomes were excellent across all groups, with CD grade 0 being the most common outcome. CD grade 0 occurred most frequently in SHO-performed procedures (92.0%), followed by registrar (80.7%) and consultant (75.0%) cases. Higher-grade complications (up to CD IIIb) were observed only in registrar and consultant groups. Conclusions LA is a safe and effective training procedure for junior surgeons, with excellent postoperative outcomes observed in SHO-performed cases. Higher complication rates in senior-performed cases likely reflect appropriate allocation of more complex appendicitis to experienced surgeons. The findings from this centre support continued trainee involvement in LA with appropriate case selection and supervision.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7172500012
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Kashifa Syed, A Hauperich, Tabitha Gould, Phill Pearce |
| Journal | the british journal of surgery |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/bjs/znag087.334
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.