SP 6.03 Improving Surgical Handover Report Documentation: A Three-Cycle Audit
Clicks: 2
ID: 323868
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
0.3
/100
2 views
1 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #351 of 432 articles by views in the british journal of surgery
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 432 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Aims To evaluate the completeness and timeliness of general surgery handover report documentation used for weekend on-call cover. To assess whether an induction-embedded intervention improved compliance with national handover standards. Methods A prospective three-cycle audit assessed handover reports for all general surgery inpatients across three wards prior to weekend on-call cover. Variables assessed included patient inclusion on the handover list, whether entries were updated prior to handover, and documentation completeness in line with Royal College of Surgeons of England guidance on safe handover. Following the initial audit cycle, results were disseminated departmentally, after which a structured handover tutorial was embedded into resident doctor induction. Compliance with audit standards was then compared across cycles. Results Across 304 patients, patient inclusion in the handover list rose from 42% at baseline to 89%, and the proportion of entries updated prior to handover rose from 27% to 77%. Documentation completeness in line with guidance increased from 23% to 50%; however, omissions in patient status and outstanding investigations persisted. These gains were most marked in the acute admission ward and among on-call teams and were sustained despite resident doctor turnover. Conclusions Embedding handover expectations into resident doctor induction was associated with sustained improvements in handover list inclusion and update frequency, despite staff turnover. Documentation completeness plateaued at 50%, indicating that while human-factor interventions improve consistency of handover report updates, further gains are likely to require system-level solutions such as electronic handover templates.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7172520845
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Leon Liu, Christophe Thomas |
| Journal | the british journal of surgery |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/bjs/znag087.076
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.