AI and Academic Integrity
Clicks: 1
ID: 323722
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #1,459 of 1,517 articles by views in Oxford University Press eBooks
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,517 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This part examines how academic integrity principles apply to the use of generative AI in coursework. It emphasizes appropriate decision-making, accurate documentation, and awareness of institutional AI policies. Guidance is provided on distinguishing between AI use that supports learning and use that undermines it, as well as strategies for effective communication with lecturers. Ethical frameworks are introduced to navigate complex scenarios, ensuring alignment with professional standards. These practices strengthen responsible AI use and prepare learners for both academic achievement and workplace expectations.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7172383763
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Dr. Anand Rao, Stefan Bauschard |
| Journal | Oxford University Press eBooks |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/hepl/9780197921845.003.0002
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.