Lipoprotein apheresis: still needed in many patients, or soon a historical practice?
Clicks: 1
ID: 323628
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #122 of 125 articles by views in clinical kidney journal
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 125 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Lipoprotein apheresis (LA) has long been used as an ultima ratio therapy for patients with extreme lipid-driven cardiovascular risk. One perspective maintains that, despite major advances in lipid-lowering pharmacology and the emergence of gene-silencing therapies, LA remains indispensable for selected patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH), severe hypercholesterolemia refractory to maximal therapy, and isolated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)]–mediated progressive cardiovascular disease. An opposing view argues that modern and emerging pharmacological agents—PCSK9 inhibitors, inclisiran, bempedoic acid, evinacumab, and targeted Lp(a)-lowering antisense and small interfering RNA (siRNA) agents—have already rendered LA obsolete in almost all patients, with its remaining niche closing rapidly as outcome data accumulate. This combined manuscript juxtaposes the two positions in a streamlined form and concludes with a balanced conclusion of the future role of LA.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7172377399
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Volker J J Schettler, Yamac Akgun, Jürgen Floege, Carmine Zoccali |
| Journal | clinical kidney journal |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/ckj/sfag240
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.