The Clean Margin in Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: Conceptual Appeal, Practical Uncertainty
Clicks: 8
ID: 323122
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
0 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Abstract Updated guidelines endorse tailoring antimicrobial treatment for diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) based on resection margins, representing a shift toward more individualized therapy. While conceptually appealing, this approach relies on a construct that remains ill-defined and inconsistently measured. Historically, infectious diseases management has emphasized source control without formal operationalization of resection margins. In DFO, the concept has evolved from descriptive assessments of residual infected bone to categorical designations of “positive” or “negative” margins, largely without prospective validation. Current recommendations are informed in part by limited trial data with uncertain ascertainment of residual infection. At the bedside, resection margin assessment varies across surgical, histopathological, and microbiological domains that are not interchangeable and often discordant, limiting reliability and complicating treatment decisions. Standardized definitions and prospective validation are needed before routine implementation.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7171978741
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Christopher Radcliffe, Marjorie Golden, Rupak Datta |
| Journal | Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/cid/ciag467
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.