Short communication: Oral microbiome as a potential proxy for methane emissions in grazing tropical composite beef cattle
Clicks: 8
ID: 322889
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
8 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #109 of 214 articles by views in italian journal of animal science
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 214 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Enteric methane emissions from ruminant livestock contribute to global warming, creating an urgent need for effective mitigation strategies that do not compromise animal productivity and welfare. Methanogenic archaea within the rumen microbiome drive enteric methane emissions. However, large-scale rumen-fluid sampling in commercial production systems is impractical, due to its invasive nature and the associated logistical challenges. This study hypothesised that rumination facilitates the capture of rumen microbial signals within the oral cavity, therefore oral microbiome profiles can be a practical alternative for explaining variation in methane emissions commercial production systems. To test the hypothesis, we estimated the oral microbiability, defined as the proportion of phenotypic variance in methane emissions explained by oral microbiome variation. Samples were collected from 209 tropical composite beef cattle across two trials in Queensland, Australia. Oral microbiome samples were obtained from all animals, with paired rumen samples in one trial, and methane emissions were measured using either the sulphur hexafluoride tracer technique or the GreenFeed system. Microbial features were characterised using taxonomic and functional annotations, and microbiability was estimated using mixed linear models incorporating microbiome-based relationship matrices. The oral microbiability reported in this study ranged from 0.27-0.63 with standard errors 0.12-0.25. Functional microbial profiles explained a numerically greater proportion of methane emission variation than taxonomic profiles in some comparisons, however, the differences were not statistically significant due to large standard errors. These findings demonstrated that oral microbiome sampling provides a practical and scalable proxy method for capturing variation in methane emissions among the individual cattle in grazing systems, where direct methane gas measurements are labour-intensive and difficult to implement. Therefore, further validation of oral microbiability against methane emissions measured in larger animal cohorts is required. Such validation would enable a more robust assessment of the predictive accuracy of oral microbiome-based models while accounting for additional sources of variation, including host genetic, environmental, and management factors, which could not be fully addressed in the present study.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7171549880
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Chian Teng Ong, Tony Cavallaro, Yuhao Li, Alan Boulton, Basil Firewski, Marloes Dekker Nitert, Kieren McCosker, Sam Clark, Scott Cullen, Melissah Dayman, Milou H Dekker, Paul Gangemi, Kerry Goodwin, Tim Grant, Rachelle Hergenhan, D. J. Johnston, Natalie Scott, Bradley Taylor, Cameron Whistler, Ben J Hayes, Marina Fortes, Elizabeth Ross |
| Journal | italian journal of animal science |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/jas/skag227
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.