Revisiting multifocal motor neuropathy: mechanisms, diagnosis and future directions
Clicks: 5
ID: 322814
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
1.2
/100
5 views
2 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #160 of 378 articles by views in Brain research
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 378 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Multifocal Motor Neuropathy (MMN) is an immune-mediated, pure motor neuropathy characterized by slowly progressive, asymmetric limb weakness. It predominantly affects men in mid-adulthood and often presents with distal upper-limb weakness, such as wrist or finger drop. Although the disease course is typically chronic, slowly and sometimes stepwise progressive, timely recognition is critical, as early immunotherapy can prevent irreversible axonal loss and long-term disability. This review aims to provide a comprehensive and clinically integrated overview of MMN, spanning pathogenesis, clinical presentation, diagnostic challenges, and current and emerging therapeutic strategies. Emphasis is placed on translating mechanistic insights into practical diagnostic and treatment frameworks, and on identifying priorities for future research. Pathophysiologically, MMN is best understood as an antibody-mediated nodo-paranodopathy. IgM antibodies directed against GM1 gangliosides bind to GM1-enriched domains at the nodes of Ranvier, activate the classical complement cascade, and disrupt sodium channel clustering and axo-glial integrity. The resulting conduction block constitutes the electrophysiological hallmark of the disease and may initially be reversible. Persistent immune-mediated injury, however, can lead to secondary axonal degeneration and fixed disability. While GM1 IgM antibodies are detected in a substantial proportion of patients, seronegativity does not exclude MMN, potentially reflecting mechanistic heterogeneity and/or assay limitations. Diagnosis relies on the combination of a characteristic clinical phenotype and electrophysiological evidence of motor conduction block with preserved sensory conduction. However, conduction block can be difficult to demonstrate because of proximal lesions, temporal dispersion, or superimposed axonal loss, contributing to diagnostic uncertainty. High-resolution nerve ultrasound and magnetic resonance neurography offer valuable complementary information by revealing focal nerve enlargement or plexus abnormalities, though neither technique is independently diagnostic. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) remains the established standard of care and the only approved therapy, producing rapid but often transient improvement that necessitates individualized maintenance regimens. Subcutaneous immunoglobulin provides an effective long-term alternative for many patients. Conventional immunosuppressants have shown limited efficacy, whereas emerging complement inhibitors targeting upstream components of the classical pathway represent a promising, mechanism-based strategy currently under clinical evaluation. Despite advances, significant gaps remain. Reliable biomarkers to predict treatment response, monitor disease activity, and detect early axonal injury are lacking. Future progress will require integrated translational models, harmonized outcome measures, and well-designed clinical trials to move toward more durable and personalized therapeutic approaches in MMN.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7171682148
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Nicolas Dubuisson, Yusuf A Rajabally, Clive Philips, Thomas Harbo, Simon Rinaldi |
| Journal | Brain research |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/brain/awag260
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.