Characterisation of seven longer period eclipsing binary systems

Clicks: 20
ID: 322306
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #419 of 1,339 articles by views in monthly notices of the royal astronomical society

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,339 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract We report a joint analysis of TESS photometry and minerva-Australis spectroscopic observations for seven long-period eclipsing binary systems with F- and early-G-type dwarf primaries: TIC 37606218, TIC 73723286, TIC 172462064, TIC 220567625, TIC 270805930, TIC 308050066, and TIC 308991822. The companions are late-K to late-M dwarfs with orbital periods of ~7–24 d, with all but one system exhibiting significant eccentricity. The combination of low-mass companions and relatively long orbital periods place these binaries in a regime where tidal interactions are comparatively weak, making them valuable benchmarks for testing low-mass stellar models with minimal tidal contamination. For the systems analysed here, together with those from our previous studies, we find that the radii and effective temperatures of the low-mass companions are broadly consistent with MIST isochrone predictions, with only a modest mean radius anomaly of ~1% and no statistically significant temperature anomaly. We furthermore find no compelling evidence for correlations between either anomaly and orbital period or metallicity, suggesting that the processes commonly invoked to explain the radius–temperature anomaly are either not the dominant drivers, or operate much less efficiently in the longer-period regime.
Reference Key
openalex_W7170637670 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal monthly notices of the royal astronomical society
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/mnras/stag1401
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.