Why Do Zooarchaeologists Study Domestic Taxa? An Exploration of Historical Trends in Chinese Zooarchaeology

Clicks: 1
ID: 322109
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #1,422 of 1,517 articles by views in Oxford University Press eBooks

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,517 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Current research and publication trajectories in Chinese zooarchaeology suggest that there is a prevailing focus on topics and questions related to animal domestication. While the earliest published studies of archaeofaunal materials excavated from archaeological sites in China were done by palaeontologists and thus reflect a focus on wild taxa, taxonomic interests changed over the course of the 20th century when zooarchaeology (動物考古) emerged as a formal discipline and the first generation of Chinese zooarchaeologists were trained. After the 1990s, the majority of Chinese zooarchaeological research was oriented towards animals that are historically known to be important domesticates in China. This primacy of domestic taxa over wild taxa is not only reflected in publication trends and state-funded research projects, but also in the development and application of scientific methods. We argue that even though zooarchaeology outside of China has a similar focus on domesticated animals, the emphasis on the study of domestic taxa in Chinese zooarchaeology is unique due to intersections between 1) the conception and development of the discipline of Chinese zooarchaeology over the 20th century; 2) institutional divisions within Chinese archaeology; 3) training, publication practices, and the resources available to Chinese zooarchaeologists; and 4) the reconstruction of national narratives that link the origins of agriculture to the origins of Chinese civilisation.
Reference Key
openalex_W7170060144 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Jada Ko, Katherine Brunson
Journal Oxford University Press eBooks
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197800324.013.0030
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197800324.013.0030
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.