Rethinking linguistic deficits, differences, and dominance
Clicks: 1
ID: 322103
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #1,498 of 1,518 articles by views in Oxford University Press eBooks
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,518 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract This chapter examines language learning through language socialization, educational linguistics, and applied linguistics, and foregrounds how cultural context, power, and history shape linguistic practices, policies, and assessments. It challenges deficit-based perspectives by reframing differences in relation to the forms of dominance through which they are (re)produced. By extension, it demonstrates how multilingual repertoires emerge through situated social processes while mainstream schooling often replicates hierarchies that marginalize racialized and minoritized learners. Drawing on ethnographic cases from a dual-language elementary school in Arizona and a California high school, the chapter analyses tensions between community practices and institutional norms, including monoglossic policies, standardized testing, and restrictive language learning classifications. It reconceptualizes language learning by highlighting translanguaging, code-switching, and learner agency, while exposing how assessments and labels such as Long-Term English Learner construct enduring novicehood and obscure linguistic dexterity. Finally, the chapter advocates systemic change to challenge linguistic domination.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7170059200
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Jonathan Rosa, Neida Basheer Ahmad, Victoria Melgarejo |
| Journal | Oxford University Press eBooks |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198873174.013.0008
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.