Resurrecting the Sogdians

Clicks: 2
ID: 322063
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #1,331 of 1,518 articles by views in Oxford University Press eBooks

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,518 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Launched by the Chinese government in 2013, the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has been presented as a 21st-century Silk Road. Through a range of archaeological excavations, the project has created an idealised historical culture representing the splendid cross-cultural achievements of many regions now targeted by the BRI. Various historical, political, and archaeological factors have contributed to shaping this perception. Chinese historiography often promotes a stereotyped and exoticised image of the ethnic other. The BRI has become a new framework for reviving the image of an idealised Chinese cosmopolitanism attributed to the historical Silk Roads. Excavations of Central Asian immigrants’ tombs in China from the Northern Dynasties and Sui periods coincided with this broader project. The first significant discovery was the tomb of Yu Hong 虞弘, a prominent official of Central Asian descent in the Sui court. The artefacts associated with this tomb have become international emblems of the Silk Roads. Driven by this, scholarship has taken a new direction, favouring terms with specific cultural and political connotations. The central figure in this narrative became the Sogdian. The discovery, reception, and interpretation of Yu Hong’s tomb exemplifies how the label ‘Sogdian’ has been applied to all Central Asian elements in the archaeological record. This approach obscures the actual historical complexity of these elements, serving a cultural heritage management agenda with clear diplomatic and geopolitical objectives.
Reference Key
openalex_W7170058980 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Kiraz Perinçek Karavit, Aybike Şeyma Tezel, Erdal Küçükyalçın
Journal Oxford University Press eBooks
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197800324.013.0038
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.