Facets of the ‘Silkroadification’ of Archaeological Discoveries from the Han-Era Hexi Corridor
Clicks: 1
ID: 322054
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #1,422 of 1,517 articles by views in Oxford University Press eBooks
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,517 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract The Silk Road paradigm has long shaped the imagination of past Eurasian connectivity, both inside and outside academia. Likewise, it has received criticism for the various modern agendas hidden behind its application to historical and archaeological material. The Hexi Corridor in modern Gansu Province has always played a central role in the imagination of the ancient Silk Road. Its alleged ‘opening’ for long-distance trading connections is commonly associated with the Han Empire’s conquest of this region. The Silk Road paradigm has thus left a particularly strong mark on interpretations of archaeological findings from this region. This is especially true for the time when Xi Jinping proclaimed the Belt and Road Initiative in 2013 and several Hexi Corridor sites became UNESCO Silk Road World Heritage Sites in 2014. The Silk Road paradigm has influenced the handling of Han-era archaeological discoveries from this region in what may be termed a ‘Silkroadification’ of these finds. Taking finds of silken textiles from the region as an example, this chapter demonstrates how political agendas are reflected in recent historical interpretations, and how their interpretation as ‘Silk Road’ evidence limits a more nuanced understanding of the history of the Hexi Corridor. Strong tendencies towards ‘Silkroadification’ can further be perceived in the public presentation of archaeological artefacts and sites in Gansu, where economic aspirations are clearly intertwined with political agendas that may also shape scholarly publications. This trend is likely to be further reinforced by Xi Jinping’s instrumentalisation of archaeology to promote ‘cultural self-confidence’.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7170061268
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Kathrin Leese-Messing |
| Journal | Oxford University Press eBooks |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197800324.013.0039
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.