Geoarchaeology, Geomythology, and the Origins of Chinese Civilisation

Clicks: 2
ID: 321977
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #410 of 1,517 articles by views in Oxford University Press eBooks

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,517 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Over the past several decades, Chinese archaeology has developed into a multifaceted field of study that is often at the cutting edge of archaeological science. Chinese archaeologists, like archaeologists around the world, have focused their research efforts on increasingly compartmentalised domains of expertise; nonetheless there are key differences between regional traditions. Perhaps foremost among them are the ways in which Chinese archaeologists have adopted advances in geoarchaeology. Geoarchaeology as a subfield of environmental archaeology has grown in the past several decades. In this chapter, I compare the origins of geoarchaeology in the US and the UK to contemporaneous developments in China to understand how different institutions and individuals helped create the increasingly global field of geoarchaeology. From this overview, I argue that from the beginning of geoarchaeological thought in China, archaeologists have used stratigraphic principles and geoscientific methods to test the veracity of the historical record. In recent years, geoscientists have tried to apply this approach to find material evidence to verify the ‘Great Flood’ myth of how the legendary Yu the Great controlled the waters. Recent geoarchaeological studies from China retell this legend using geologic evidence ranging from paleoclimate studies to microstratigraphic analyses, lending scientific support to a story that many historians of early China consider apocryphal. This interest in using geological methods to test the veracity of the received textual tradition in China has led to science and myth becoming unlikely bedfellows.
Reference Key
openalex_W7170030764 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Michael Storozum
Journal Oxford University Press eBooks
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197800324.013.0031
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197800324.013.0031
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.