In Search of the First Dynasty
Clicks: 2
ID: 321971
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
0.3
/100
2 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #210 of 1,517 articles by views in Oxford University Press eBooks
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,517 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract The search for archaeological evidence of the Xia civilisation, recorded in transmitted texts as the first Chinese dynasty, has been a major objective of Chinese archaeology since its inception. The prevailing narrative on the history of Chinese archaeology portrays the search for the Xia as an example of archaeological research co-opted and dominated by the Chinese nation-state-building agenda. This chapter explores the history of this archaeological endeavour against the backdrop of shifting intellectual debates. This research challenges the idea that the 1959 exploration of the Xia Culture by the Institute of Archaeology was planned by Xia Nai and executed by Xu Xusheng as part of the National 12-Year Scientific Development Plan (1956–1967). By comparing Xu’s and Xia’s diaries, along with the recollections of participants in the expedition, it becomes clear that the search for the Xia Culture was primarily spearheaded by Xu Xusheng against the intellectual trends of his time. The archaeological exploration of Xia culture actually emerged from tensions and compromises between scholars affiliated with two academic traditions in the first half of the 20th century: the Institute of History and Philology at Academia Sinica and the Institute of History at the Beiping Academy. Only by understanding the history of this archaeological project will it be possible to design new conceptual frameworks that can accommodate issues of legendary narratives and placemaking.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7170044745
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Min Li |
| Journal | Oxford University Press eBooks |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197800324.013.0007
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.