Photoexposure Region-Weighting Factors for Photosensitive Disease Severity Assessment: Development and Preliminary Reliability of PRWF-based Scoring

Clicks: 3
ID: 321917
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #76 of 300 articles by views in the british journal of dermatology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 300 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dermatological severity indices commonly use body surface area-based regional weightings to combine regional disease scores into an overall score. In photosensitive disease, however, disease activity often concentrates at highly photoexposed anatomical sites that constitute a limited proportion of total body surface area. This may introduce systematic bias by constraining the contribution of clinically important photoexposed regions to total severity scores. OBJECTIVES: To develop photoexposure region-weighting factors (PRWFs) as a standardised, photoexposure-informed approach to addressing surface area-related bias in photosensitive disease severity assessment. METHODS: Anatomical regions characteristically affected in photosensitive disease were defined through expert consensus and mapped onto a body surface model. Regional ultraviolet exposure was calculated using a computational model across walking, standing and sitting postures. Exposure calculations were combined across postures, integrated by regional surface area, normalised within the photoexposed assessment domain and rounded to derive clinically applicable PRWFs. Preliminary clinical reliability was assessed using an earlier PRWF-based modification of the Eczema Area and Severity Index in six image-based atopic dermatitis cases scored by eight assessors across four institutions. RESULTS: Five anatomical regions were included: the face, V-area of the neck and upper chest, dorsal neck, dorsal forearms and dorsal hands. Collectively, these regions accounted for 10.7% of total body surface area. Clinically rounded PRWFs were 0.3× for the face, 0.1× for the V-area, 0.1× for the dorsal neck, 0.3× for the dorsal forearms and 0.2× for the dorsal hands. The earlier PRWF-based modification of the Eczema Area and Severity Index showed good inter-rater reliability in the first assessment round and moderate reliability in the second (ICC 0.81 and 0.70, respectively), with good median intra-rater reliability (ICC 0.84). CONCLUSIONS: PRWFs provide a standardised framework for addressing surface area-related bias in photosensitive disease severity assessment by weighting anatomical regions according to ultraviolet exposure rather than surface area alone. Preliminary reliability findings support the reproducibility of PRWF-based clinical scoring, but prospective validation of the final PRWF framework is required before routine clinical or trial use.
Reference Key
openalex_W7169851843 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors John Warner‐Levy, Michele Marro, Nathan Downs, Donna Parkin, Tsui C. Ling, C P. Wong, Mandy W M Chan, Michael Evers, Ga Ram Ahn, Dieter Manstein, Jean Ayer
Journal the british journal of dermatology
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/bjd/ljag297
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljag297
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.