Raising male drones affects honey bee ( Apis mellifera ) foraging behavior
Clicks: 9
ID: 321680
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
9 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #21 of 113 articles by views in integrative and comparative biology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Globally, honey bees (Apis mellifera) are a vital commercial pollinator, contributing to food security and economies. One of the most pressing threats honey bees face is the parasitic mite Varroa destructor, which weakens bees and spreads pathogens. There are many chemicals for mitigating mite population growth however, many have unintended consequences on the bees themselves and/or hive products. A popular, chemical-free method of combatting Varroa is drone comb removal, which provides the colonies with the space to raise larger, mite-preferred male bees, or drones. While this method has been shown to reduce colony-level mite numbers, it may add another, unanticipated, layer of colony-level stress; drones are nutritionally expensive to raise, particularly in protein. We examined how investment in protein-rich drones affects the in-hive worker population and colony-level foraging behavior. Raising drones did not affect the in-hive worker population however, it did lead to a larger proportion of foragers returning to the hive with protein-rich pollen. The crude protein content (%) of pollen brought back to the hive remained the same among treatments suggesting that colonies raising drones allocated more energy to pollen foraging, but did not seem to seek resources with a higher crude protein content. This could be due to a lack of discrimination of pollen nutritional quality by foragers and/or availability of diverse floral resources. Here we present an applied system for future studies investigating integrated pest management in honey bee colonies, and a basic system for understanding how shifts in social insect sex ratios affect colony-level processes such as foraging and overall productivity.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7169808469
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Rachael E. Bonoan, K Bresnahan, Grace E O’Brien, Elizabeth M Glasspool, Christopher Walsh, Anna R Tattelman, Adam Garies, Riley E Quirk |
| Journal | integrative and comparative biology |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/icb/icag122
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.