The RESOLVE Trial: A Stepped-Wedge, Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating the Effects of Clinical Practice Guidelines and Psychologically Informed Physical Therapy on Low Back Pain Outcomes in Service Members and Veterans

Clicks: 9
ID: 321593
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
0.0 /100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Abstract Importance Low back pain (LBP) clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) recommend using evidence-based active and manual treatments within a psychologically informed physical therapy (PIPT) framework, but the effectiveness of a combined, CPG-adherent approach remains understudied. Objective This trial evaluated the effectiveness of a CPG and PIPT (CPG+PIPT) implementation strategy in reducing LBP-related disability, pain, and downstream health care utilization. Design This was a multisite, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized trial. Setting The locations were military and veteran health care settings. Participants Data from patients seeking LBP care were collected during usual care, training, and post-training (CPG+PIPT) periods. Interventions Physical therapists from 6 clinics received CPG+PIPT training and monthly feedback reports regarding practice patterns and patient outcomes. Main Outcomes and Measures Primary outcomes were the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS), obtained at intake and regular intervals throughout treatment. LBP-related health care utilization data (opioid prescriptions, spinal injections, specialty care visits, hospitalizations, imaging) were extracted from medical databases 12 months after the index visit. Linear mixed models were used to test whether ODI and DVPRS trajectories improved after training. Generalized linear mixed models were used to compare LBP-related health care utilization between usual care and CPG+PIPT periods. Results Analysis included data from 2320 patients seen by 74 physical therapists. Patients reported moderate disability (ODI) and pain (DVPRS) at intake, which persisted throughout follow-up. Patients treated during the CPG+PIPT period had slightly more ODI and DVPRS improvements over time but no clinically meaningful differences at 6 and 12 weeks. The CPG+PIPT period was associated with a 30% reduction in 12-month opioid prescriptions, but patterns of other LBP-related encounters and physical therapist treatments were similar across periods. Conclusions Despite promising improvements in opioid prescription rates, minimal changes in other practice patterns were observed, and differences in outcomes did not translate to clinically meaningful improvements. Relevance Findings underscore the complexity of implementing high-value LBP management strategies in military and veteran health care settings.
Reference Key
openalex_W7169729132 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Emma Haldane Beisheim, Brad D. Hendershot, Charity G. Patterson, Joseph Kakyomya, Jason Maikos, M Jason Highsmith, Sara Gorczynski, RESOLVE Trial Team, Morgan L Armes, Andrea E Crunkhorn, Anthony Delitto, Ariana Emory, Carol M. Greco, Binni Khatri, John M. Mayer, Michael Schneider, Nigel Shenoy, Bridget Smith, Meghan Tullos, Christopher L. Dearth, Shawn Farrokhi
Journal Physical Therapy
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/ptj/pzag074
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.