Canopy theory for photosynthetic production by macroalgal forests

Clicks: 1
ID: 321499
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #188 of 189 articles by views in Annals of botany

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 189 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Many ecosystem services associated with macroalgae depend on the biomass of a canopy-forming habitat. Studies of photosynthetic production in macroalgal forests have generally not considered the consequences of uneven distributions of resources: like the decline in light with depth in the canopy. The effects of shading mean that it is not possible to multiply up from incubations of single fronds or parts of fronds to estimate canopy photosynthesis. SCOPE: Canopy models split the vertical structure into discrete layers before estimating photosynthesis. Models can also approximate the canopy as a single surface (a 'big-leaf' model). I demonstrate these approaches and make a sensitivity analysis of a previously published multiple layer model parameterised for Fucus serratus. Optimality theory suggests that canopies will tend toward a state that is maximally productive. Applied to a big-frond model, optimality predicts peak biomass at different irradiance levels. KEY RESULTS: Sensitivity analysis identified canopy attenuation coefficient as the most important influence on net photosynthesis. Increasing biomass (as thallus area index: m2 thallus m-2 seabed) increases areal net photosynthesis, but with diminishing returns. Eventually, the respiratory cost of adding extra biomass starts to reduce net photosynthesis. A big-frond model could describe the best-performing simulated canopies, particularly if photosynthetic parameters are tuned to implicitly take account of processes that the big-frond approach omits. Peak biomass tracking of light climate suggests more pronounced seasonality at relatively high-latitude locations. CONCLUSIONS: The investigation advocates for a canopy approach to macroalgae: identifying understudied variables of interest. Better empirical definition of parameters can improve large-scale summaries of macroalgal net production that currently rely on spatially invariant means. Canopy theory can enrich the discussion of the functioning of algal habitats and can suggest hypotheses for investigation, such as the degree and consequences of changes in the seasonal amplitude of macroalgal biomass.
Reference Key
openalex_W7169526511 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Mark P. Johnson
Journal Annals of botany
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/aob/mcag212
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcag212
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.