The Evolution of the Role and Purpose of Group Prudential Requirements

Clicks: 2
ID: 321437
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #1,116 of 1,518 articles by views in Oxford University Press eBooks

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,518 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Solvency II imposes not only prudential requirements on individual (re)insurance undertakings in Europe, but also regulatory requirements at group level. Group requirements reflect the view that the group context can generate benefits—such as synergy and diversification effects—and may improve the risk profile of individual entities, while also creating additional risks for group members compared with stand-alone undertakings. Historically, group requirements were regarded as supplementary, and this remains relevant in many respects. However, Solvency II represents a significant step in the maturation of insurance group supervision, raising the question whether group supervision is still truly ‘supplementary’ in all respects. This chapter examines Pillar 1 requirements and analyses the objectives of Solvency II group supervision, with particular emphasis on group solvency requirements. It starts with reflections on the nature, purpose, and objectives of group supervision—especially the supervision of group solvency—and outlines alternative approaches to insurance group supervision. It then turns to Solvency II group supervision, highlighting selected features and issues relevant to group solvency. The chapter concludes by summarising key international developments and drawing overall conclusions.
Reference Key
openalex_W7169612506 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Arthur van den Hurk
Journal Oxford University Press eBooks
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/law/9780198927617.003.0010
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.