FAIR Data Standards for AI in Plant Biology: Current Practice and Case Studies
Clicks: 3
ID: 321434
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
0.6
/100
3 views
2 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #232 of 293 articles by views in Journal of experimental botany
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 293 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become a central analytical approach in plant science, supporting prediction, pattern discovery, and integration across molecular, phenotypic, and environmental data. While methodological advances have been rapid, progress is increasingly constrained less by algorithms than by the structure, semantics, and interoperability of the underlying data. In this review, we examine how the Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR) principles are currently realized in AI-driven plant research and how different implementations shape which AI analyses are feasible in practice. We introduce a readiness level perspective that treats FAIR not as a binary property, but as a spectrum of operational implementations ranging from unstructured data to fully machine-actionable FAIR Digital Objects. Applying this framework to molecular, phenotypic, and integrative use cases, we show that FAIR readiness is strongly method and context-dependent. Task-focused AI applications can succeed at lower readiness levels, whereas integrative, transferable, and reproducible analyses consistently require richer metadata, explicit semantics, and traceable provenance. We also note that many advances depend on shared infrastructure and community-maintained practices that allow curation and reuse to accumulate across projects. We argue for a shift from FAIR compliance toward FAIR capability to enable scalable and sustainable AI-driven discovery in plant science.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7169558161
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Kevin Schneider, Heinrich Lukas Weil, Timo Mühlhaus |
| Journal | Journal of experimental botany |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/jxb/erag290
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.