Core Concepts of EU Gender Equality Law
Clicks: 1
ID: 321410
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #1,492 of 1,518 articles by views in Oxford University Press eBooks
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,518 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract This chapter critically examines the key concepts underpinning EU gender equality law, as developed through CJEU case law and EU legislation. It starts by discussing sex, gender, and gender identity. It then turns to the main conceptualizations of equality, notably equal treatment, equal opportunities, and positive action. The chapter subsequently discusses the various forms of discrimination as recognized in EU law: direct and indirect discrimination, harassment, victimisation, discrimination by association, instruction to discriminate, and intersectional discrimination. The chapter lastly examines the concept of the comparator and the concept of worker. By tracing how these concepts have been interpreted and developed over time, the chapter provides a critical overview of what potential and limitations they offer to support structural change. The chapter argues that EU gender equality law remains largely anchored in a binary understanding of gender, reflects an ambiguous commitment to substantive equality, and struggles to address intersectional discrimination effectively. At the same time, the chapter identifies doctrinal openings within the existing legal framework which could further be developed to challenge structural gender inequality.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7169496501
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Alexandra Timmer, Linda Senden, Susanne Burri |
| Journal | Oxford University Press eBooks |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/law/9780198845256.003.0004
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.