Improving exoplanet mass characterisation with Bayesian model selection using the Learned Harmonic Mean Estimator

Clicks: 1
ID: 321351
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #889 of 908 articles by views in monthly notices of the royal astronomical society

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 908 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Radial velocity (RV) analyses require modelling choices (such as eccentricity treatment, noise model, velocity trends, and number of planets) that can significantly affect derived planetary masses. Current practice often relies on information criteria to compare and select models, but these have known limitations: they lack the built-in Occam’s razor of Bayesian model comparison, and they do not incorporate prior information. Computing the Bayesian evidence needed for Bayes factor model comparison has traditionally required dedicated algorithms such as nested sampling. The learned harmonic mean estimator (LHME) offers an alternative, estimating the Bayesian evidence directly from MCMC posterior samples, with less computational cost and with no modification to the fitting procedure. We present the first application of the LHME to RV model selection, fitting 18 model variants – comparing circular and eccentric orbits, white noise and Gaussian Process noise models, and long-term velocity trends – to six single-planet systems, and 72 variants to a seventh system for an N versus N + 1 planet model comparison. We find that no single model is universally preferred, reinforcing the need for model comparison to select the most appropriate model for a system, thereby ensuring robust mass characterisation. The LHME, implemented in the open-source harmonic package, makes rigorous Bayesian model comparison accessible to existing MCMC-based RV workflows, and we encourage its wider use for other model comparisons in astrophysics.
Reference Key
openalex_W7169177048 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Ross Dobson, Vincent Van Eylen, Ioanna Manolopoulou, Kendall Sullivan
Journal monthly notices of the royal astronomical society
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/mnras/stag1343
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stag1343
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.