Health interventions for men who have sex with men and women (MSMW): insights from a scoping review

Clicks: 17
ID: 321246
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #28 of 96 articles by views in turkish journal of public health

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Aim Men who have sex with men and women (MSMW) experience distinct sexual health risks but remain underserved by existing interventions. This study aimed to identify gaps in intervention research and inform the development of more accessible and responsive sexual health programmes. Subject and methods A scoping review was conducted to map the sexual, social, and health-related experiences of MSMW, using academic and grey literature sources. Studies published from 2013 onwards that addressed the intersection between sexual identity, sexual behaviour, and sexual attraction; stigma and discrimination; health-seeking behaviours; sexually transmitted infection (STI) and blood-borne virus (BBV) risk and protective behaviours; disclosure; sexual behaviours; and health interventions relating to MSMW were included. Data were synthesised thematically. Results Fourteen studies addressed sexual health interventions. Only two evaluated interventions specifically designed for MSMW were included, both demonstrating positive behavioural and psychosocial outcomes but with limited generalisability. Most studies were descriptive or conceptual, highlighting limited engagement of men who do not identify with sexual minority labels, reliance on identity-based intervention models, and structural barriers within health services. Evidence on health professional perspectives was limited, with gaps identified in training and behaviour-focused engagement strategies. Conclusion Current sexual health interventions may fail to engage MSMW due to reliance on identity-based models and assumptions about disclosure. Public health responses would benefit from behaviour-focused, discreet, and inclusive intervention designs, alongside greater attention to implementation within routine sexual health and primary care systems. Translating existing recommendations into implemented and rigorously evaluated programmes should be an urgent priority.
Reference Key
openalex_W7168846221 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Tricia Reid-Moore, Jacqueline Hendriks, Gemma Crawford, Sharyn Burns
Journal turkish journal of public health
Year 2026
DOI
10.1007/s10389-026-02848-3
URL
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-026-02848-3
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.